|
|
6
are exceptions to this pattern of usage which suggest that the ground squirrel call system does
not denote predator type. Squirrels being closely pursued by carnivores sometimes produce
whistles, and chatters are given to distant hawks (Owings and Virginia, 1978; Leger et al.,
1980; Owings and Leger, 1980). Similar patterns of call usage have been described in
Belding's ground squirrels (Robinson, 1980, 1981; Sherman, 1985) and marmots (Blumstein,
1995a,b; Blumstein and Arnold, 1995; Blumstein, in press). The data on alarm call production
in sciurids are consistent with the idea that these signals do not describe predator classes
directly, but rather encode differences in response urgency perceived by the caller. This will
vary quite reliably with predator type, as fast-moving hawks usually afford less time for escape
than the relatively slow approach of a carnivore. Ground squirrels and marmots thus have call
systems that are exquisitely well-matched to the hunting tactics of their two principal classes of
predator; the signals are designed to allow receivers to judge the time available for fleeing to a
burrow refuge, which is arguably information of greater functional importance than a
taxonomic description of the approaching threat.
Signals with the property of functional reference must also meet a perception criterion. They
should be sufficient, in the absence of the eliciting stimulus and of other normally available
cues, to permit receivers to select appropriate responses. This property has been termed
'context independence' (Evans et al., 1993a; Macedonia and Evans, 1993). The most common
technique for assessing perception of putative referential signals is playback experiments, in
which recorded sounds are presented to conspecific receivers (e.g., Seyfarth et al., 1980b;
Macedonia, 1990; Evans et al., 1993a). This approach, by design, strips away the contextual
cues that might normally be provided by the non-vocal behaviour of the sender. Appropriate
responses reveal that such information is not essential, but they do not demonstrate that it is
unimportant (see below).
Theoretical papers discussing the issue of external reference in animal signals have traditionally
employed a simple dichotomous classification scheme in which signals are considered to be
either affective or referential (Marler, 1977, 1978, 1984; Gouzoules et al., 1985). More recent
work has modelled the properties of animal signals as points falling along a continuum, with
signals that principally reflect the motivational state of the sender, such as the distress calls of
precocial birds (Collias and Joos, 1953; Abraham, 1974) and the cries of human infants
(Lester, 1985), at one end, and affect-free referential signals, such as machine-generated
speech, at the other. Categorizing a signal as functionally referential is equivalent to postulating
a threshold value on such an underlying continuum, and then demonstrating empirically that the
properties of the signal are such that it is exceeded. There is a degree of unavoidable
arbitrariness inherent in partitioning any sort of variation in this fashion. It is also true that
whether or not a signal meets the criteria described above will be dependent not only upon the
characteristics of the system being studied, but also upon extraneous factors such as the
number of animals available for study (and hence the level of statistical power), and the
sensitivity of the response assays employed. The advantage of this approach is that it allows us
to address issues, such as the development and phylogenetic distribution of referential signals,
that would otherwise be intractable.
|
|